Friday, January 11, 2013

A quote of Max Mueller

Via Wiki:

In a letter to his wife, he said:

The translation of the Veda will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of India and on the growth of millions of souls in that country. It is the root of their religion, and to show them what the root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has sprung from it during the last 3000 years.
 CIP thinks that Max Mueller studied Sanskrit and translated the Vedas out of scientific curiosity or as a student of culture.  As PT Barnum said, in America, a sucker is born every minute.

In another letter:
 As to religion, that will take care of itself. The missionaries have done far more than they themselves seem to be aware of, nay, much of the work which is theirs they would probably disclaim. The Christianity of our nineteenth century will hardly be the Christianity of India. But the ancient religion of India is doomed — and if Christianity does not step in, whose fault will it be?"
It is clear Max Mueller studied India to destroy it.

PS: And the Hindu has become so stupid that he is so honored to be studied by the white-skinned European and holds Max Mueller in high regard.

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Mueller is hardly the founder of anthropology or characteristic of the discipline in its modern form. I have not studied him in any detail, but I suspect you are misinterpreting him. Mueller was a German Lutheran, very much influenced by the Protestant reformation, and he was convinced than India needed a similar reformation in its own religion. It seems more than a little tendentious to claim that his translations of the Indian Sacred writings were designed to destroy them - you translate something to preserve and understand it, not to destroy it. If you want to destroy something you burn it, like the Spanish burnt the Mayan codexes.
1 reply · active 637 weeks ago
1. You rarely get such explicit statements of intention.
2. European historians knew by then the millennium-long effort by Islam to extirpate Hinduism in the Spanish way had failed. In fact the British used that history to argue to Hindus that Britsh rule was to be preferred.
That said, he was a man of his times, and felt that European cultures were superior and the future of the world, and that India would become more like them while retaining a distinctive character. It's pretty hard to dispute that he was pretty close to right on that prophecy.
For good and for ill, the world has become more European in everything from economics to cultural attitudes. Europe has hardly stood still either, but as of now, the flow of change over the last few hundred years has mostly reversed the previous flow of ideas and technology from the East to the West.
Civilizations are not static. Mueller saw that part clearly. Since you accuse me of being the "sucker born every minute," I will accuse you of being a hopeless romantic. India, like the rest of the world, has been evolving very rapidly, under forces that are both external and internal.
1 reply · active 637 weeks ago
I'm aware that India has been evolving rapidly, and it was evolving rapidly before the Europeans came (in pace with the times). It is another superstition created and promulgated by the Europeans of the "unchanging and static East".

And yes, like Europeans of his time, Muller was an imperialist. Imperialists ALWAYS claim they are out to improve their subjects, whether it is by delivering Islam, or Christianity, or Democracy or Human Rights. And most of the practioners of the various humanities were likewise imperialists. Which is something you disagreed with just a while ago on your blog. As I wrote, the study of culture has been the handmaiden of empire.
I didn't claim that Indian civilization was or had been static - I said the opposite. For most of the history of European civilization, technology and ideas have flowed mainly from the East - from China, India, and the Middle East. That flow, I think, has mainly but hardly exclusively gone the other way in the last couple of centuries.

I also think you are quite wrong about a lot of imperial impulses. Many or most start with simple greed. That was certainly true of the European conquests of the past half-millennium. Improving the conquered was a rather delayed after thought.

Post a new comment

Comments by