Tracing back from the newspaper article to the journal article to the source of data lands one at the World Values Survey (WVS) (http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org). The data on which the findings are based date to the WVS survey questionnaire from 2005, that was conducted in India in 2006. The questionnaire was translated into Hindi by some of the researchers, back-translated to English by someone else, and the whole thing was approved by the WVS organization. The Hindi master was used for translation into other Indian languages. The way the polling was conducted was exit polling - random selection of voters at randomly selected polling stations at randomly selected constituencies in 19 or so states.
So this is a survey of opinions of actual voters, at the time of elections - which are emotionally charged times, when politicians appeal to caste and religion.
Apart from the WVS survey, there was an extensive questionnaire on the respondents's background. I do not know whether this was done before or after the WVS questions. I do know that question 18 of this background survey had a very fine-grained division into castes, including e.g., just for Muslims - Muslim Ashraf, Muslim Mughal (Khan), various Muslim OBCs, Muslim Dalit, so you can imagine the categorization of Hindus. Why this is significant is if one asked the background questions before the WVS questions one has made the respondent intensely aware of his caste identity at the time of posing the WVS question. (Question 77 of the background survey is about language.)
Apart from that the survey question in Hindi was posed with "jaati" for "race". "Jaati" does not have the meaning or connotations of "race". "Jaati", IMO, is best defined as an endogamous group of people, and a connotation will be "having a common profession". The survey question is at the end of this post.
Anyway, what is interesting is that the WVS survey was conducted in India in 1990, 1995, 2001 also. I do not know how the survey sample was conducted or how the question was posed in those surveys. Let us assume that these are all comparable. Then what is interesting - more so than the absolute numbers - is the trend.
(You would not like to have as neighbors people of different race.)
1990 - 34.9% (2500 respondents)
1995 - 36.0% (2040 respondents)
2001 - 41.8% (2002 respondents)
2006 - 48.8% (1786 respondents)
For comparison (You would not like to have as neighbors immigrants/foreign workers)
1990 - 36.6%
1995 - 33.1%
2001 - 38.2%
2006 - 39.2%
Interestingly, only in the 2001 survey the question was posed (You would not like to have as neighbors people of the same religion)
2001 - 41.8%. I'm guessing this must be a data-entry error.
"Jaati"-intolerance seems to have risen, while intolerance of immigrants/foreign workers - who are almost certainly of a different jaati, but maybe common profession - has not moved much.
Assuming the data at each survey is meaningful and the data is comparable across surveys, this trend in jaati-intolerance is to be explained - why has it risen so much in 15 years?
The 2005 survey question was:
On this list are various groups of people. Could you please mention any that you would not like to have as neighbors?
1. Drug addicts
2. People of a different race
3. People who have AIDS
4. Immigrants/foreign workers
5. Homosexuals
6. People of a different religion
7. Heavy drinkers
8. Unmarried couples living together
9. People who speak a different language
10. (optional: minority relevant to given country, write in):
The Hindi translation of the question is available as asked (I'm transliterating into Roman)
Mein ab aapke saamne kuch khaas log/samudaya ka zikra karunga/karungi, yah bataayen, aap inmein se kinhe apne padosi ke roop mein pasand nahin karenge?
a. nashaa karne waalaa
b. doosri jaati ke log
c. AIDS bimari se grasit vyakti
d. videshi
e. samlaigik
f. doosre dharma ke log
g. sharaabi
h. avivaahit stri-purush jo pati-patni ki tarah rahte hain
i. doosri bhasha bolne waale log
j. doosre rajya/praant ka vyakti
How the results are recorded for India (1786 respondents)
People that the respondent would not like to have as a neighbor:
Drug addicts: 60.3%
People of a different race: 48.8%
People who have AIDS: 48.9%
Immigrants/Foreign workers: 39.2%
Homosexuals: 45.2%
People of a different religion: 49.2%
Heavy drinkers: 54.3%
Unmarried couples living together: 47.8%
People who speak a different language: 44.6%
Militant minority: 43.7%
For comparison purposes, the figures for the USA are (1200 respondents)
Drug addicts: 93.8%
People of a different race: 4.1%
People who have AIDS: 15.9%
Immigrants/Foreign workers: 13.2%
Homosexuals: 26.0%
People of a different religion: 2.6%
Heavy drinkers: 72.9%
Unmarried couples living together: 8.4%
People who speak a different language: 11.1%
Militant minority: 14.8%
Vishal · 620 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
Race in the West begins with the biblical story of Noah, and his three sons, Shem, Ham and Japeth. All humans are supposedly descended from this three. Japheth is the ancestor of Europeans, Ham is the ancestor of Africans, and Shem of the Semites (Arabs, Hebrews). Then for example, Wiki tells us "the 17th-century Jesuit, Athanasius Kircher, thought that the Chinese had also descended from Ham, via Egyptians".
With the arrival of the scientific study of human populations, this set of concepts drove what appeared to be science-based classifications. They are all almost all bogus. As noted in a previous post, Ta-Nehisi Coates noted that despite having only fuzzy definitions of "race", Western culture has had a preoccupation of theorizing about it (as also IQ). {Let us note that a highly quantitative field with precise measurements underlying it need not be scientific, for instance, astrology or phrenology. "Race" science does not even have that much going for it.}
This is not to say that Indians are not skin-color conscious, or that they do not discriminate against groups that they see as distinct from their own group, etc. But the feature measured in the WVS survey is not "racism" it is "jaati-ism". My post title has "racism" only because that is how the WaPo article that started me off has described it.
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
and here is a much more positive one: http://www.bmj.com/content/335/7633/1308
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
The answer is simple - After the Biblical great flood, Noah's ark supposedly came to rest somewhere in the Caucasian mountain range.
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
Male 56.8%, Female: 43.2%
Literate: 69.5%
Illiterate: 30.5%
Religion: Hindu 80.3%, Muslim 8.6%, Christian 3.3%, Sikh 3.4% (no religion also is thre)
Scheduled Castes: 18.5%, Scheduled Tribes: 9.3%
Dunkin · 619 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago
tdrake · 338 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
Andhra Pradesh - Bhadrachalam, Nellore, Hindupur
Assam - Guwahati
Bihar - Gopalganj, Jhanjharpur, Purnea, Buxar
Chattisgarh - Raipur
Gujarat - Jamnagar, Kapadvanj
Haryana - Faridabad
Jharkhand - Chatra
Karnataka - Davangere, Udupi
Kerala - Adoor
Madhya Pradesh - Manla, Ujjain
Maharashtra - Dahanu, Nagpur, Latur, Sangli
Orissa - Jajpur, Phulbani
Punjab - Ropar
Rajasthan - Sikar, Udaipur
Tamil Nadu - Vellore, Coimbatore, Sivaganga
Uttar Pradesh - Rampur, Mohanlalgunj, Basti, Macchlishahr, Jhansi, Mathura
West Bengal - Barasat, Hooghly, Bolpur
New Delhi - East Delhi
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
Afghanistan is more diverse than India!
Quote: "If you called up two people at random in a particular country and ask them their ethnicity, what are the odds that they would give different answers? The higher the odds, the more ethnically “fractionalized” or diverse the country."
I suppose it is a good thing that India is less "diverse" than Afghanistan!
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 620 weeks ago
I see myself as a world citizen (mein khud ko vishva naagarik ke roop mein dekhta hoon)
Strongly agree 36.8%, Agree 41.3%, Disagree 17.9% Strongly disagree 4.0% (1491 respondents)
I see myself as a member of my local community (sthaniya samudaaya ke sadsya)
Strongly agree 46.2%, Agree 40.7%, Disagree 9.0%, Strongly disagree 4.1% (1678 respondents)
I see myself as a citizen of the [country] nation (bhaaratiya naagarik)
Strongly agree 68.3%, Agree 26.8%, Disagree 3.0%, Strongly disagree 19.% (1794 respondents)
I see myself as a citizen of Asia (dakshina asia ke naagarik)
Strongly agree 27.2%, Agree 36.3%, Disagree 24.5%, Strongly disagree 12.0% (1230 respondents)
I see myself as an autonomous individual (swatantra vyakti)
Strongly agree 51.5%, Agree 32.9%, Disagree 11.2%, Strongly disagree 4.4% (1425 respondents)
These 78.1% world citizens nevertheless don't want a neighbor of a different jaati at a 48.8% rate!!!
:)
CIP · 619 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago
If you are getting married in India, and you or the girl you are asking about are Hindu, then you come under the Hindu Marriage act. In most cases under that Act, first cousins would be sapinda, and the Hindu Marriage Act would barr you from marrying each other. "Sapinda" means that you are part of the same extended family with rights of inheritance and mutual support within that group. Hindus cannot marry within their sapinda. To determine if you are sapinda with someone else, count up the generations to a common relative:
From you to your mother: one generation
From your mother to your grandmother, who is also your cousin's grandmother: a second generation
If it is three generations or fewer going through your mother, then you are sapinda; or ...
If it is five generations or fewer, going through your father, then you are sapinda.
The Hindu marriage act allows exceptions to the sapinda rule, where there is a pre-existing tradition of cousin marriage. If you belong to a caste and ethnic subgrouping where paternal cousin marriage is an accepted custom, your marriage would be allowed. That however is unlikely; as it is far more common for caste custom to allow only maternal cousin marriage, and that only in some regions of India's south.
CIP · 619 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago
CIP · 619 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathur_Vaishya
I think it is out-moded now.
tdrake · 339 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 338 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 619 weeks ago