
Sunday, April 29, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Partly collected thoughts.
The last comments for
FACT NO 1: RIVER SARASWATI WAS PERENNIAL FROM ABOUT 7000 BCE TO 2500 BCE (Chatterjee, A., Ray, J.S.,...
December 06, 2024 09:10:03 Jump to
The last comments for
Sten Konow: The Aryan Gods of the Mitani People
What part of Konow's argument has been invalidated?Do tell, don't speculate.-Arun
August 06, 2024 22:02:49 Jump to
Here are some issues with using Konow's paper, which is from 1923. It is from 1923. If he had...
August 06, 2024 03:05:26 Jump to
The last comments for
Very nice shot
July 18, 2024 11:59:17 Jump to
The last comments for
Comments by IntenseDebate
6 comments:
You could use a 1.4x TC with the 70-200mm to give you 280mm. Stiill not long enough for birding. I find my 300mm f/4 L IS short as well. I think you need a minimum of 400mm. Canon's 400mm f/5.6 L is said to be a stellar lens in terms of performance, but it does not have IS. Many expect Canon to update this lens with IS. The other Canon option is the 100-400mm L IS zoom - this has a push-pull zoom mechanism which enables rapid zooming, although people allege it is a dust pump as a result.
The two things to be thought about are - affordability and transportability.
The 300mm f/2.8 L IS supposedly performs well with a 2x TC giving 600 mm f/5.6; it would be on the limit of hand-holdability. It is also expensive.
The 300mm f/4 L IS could take a 1.4x TC, giving 520 mm f/5.6 - and will be not heavier than the 70-200mm f/2.8 LIS, I think?
I think in roughly the same ballpark of cost as the 300mm f/4 LIS + 1.4 TC, the Bigma is another possibility. The Bigma is somewhat heavier than the 70-200mm f/2.8 LIS, and has no image stabilization; but people seem to have good hand-held shots with it.
So, Rajan, if you have a 1.4x TC, do let me know how it works with your 300mm f/4 LIS. :)
I have used the 1.4x TC on my 300mm f/1.4 L IS very occasionally but for only compressed landscape shots and that too, on a tripod. The pictures, as I recall, were very good. Unfortunately I don't have any saved.
If you put a 2x TC on the 300mm f/2.8 L IS to convert it to 600mm f/5.6, you will seldom get sharp shots in the field (unless you have very bright lighting conditions) since shutter speeds of at least 1/600s will be needed. I think for handheld birding the 400mm f/5.6 is a beauty. Too bad it doesn't have IS.
I have not researched the Bigma. Many Canon L fanatics are not too excited about it.
By the way, there was a hilarious thread on dpreview some months back. One fellow in the US, not much into photography, got the big 500mm Canon lens as a gift from his wife to shoot his kids on the field. He complained that he had a hard time locating his boy with that narrow a f.o.v. and didn;t know what to do with the lens.
:)
This may interest you:- there is an example of a 1.4x TC cascaded with a 2x TC and the 300mm f/2.8 LIS :)
http://www.digiscoped.com/canon300mm.html
Arun,
See this -
http://tinyurl.com/yvwsuz
I have the TS-E 90mm but have yet to practise with it. Nori also has some very beautiful landscape and bird picture on his site.
mammaji.... check out my blog too http://ashishpaul2004.photoblog.com/
Post a Comment