skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A review of Maya Tudor's "The Promise of Power", by B. Surendra Rao.
The dynamics of Indian freedom movement under the Gandhian leadership
emanated from its ability and willingness to connect with disparate
constituencies in a bid to develop a programmatic unity, so that by 1947
“Congress had helped delimit an Indian nation, establish its
egalitarian character, and broadly popularise nationalism in the
consciousness in a broad swath of colonial Indian society…” The Muslim
League as the ‘institutional incarnation of Pakistani nationalism’ was
“anti-democratic in the sense that it rejected a defining process of
democracy.” Its social and political alliances were weak, it had no
economic programmes to project and was driven only by its anti-Hindu
rhetoric and the Pied Piper charisma of Jinnah. If Congress was able to
hammer out coherent coalitions with class groups with conflicting
interests, the Muslim League merely cobbled together “a relatively
incoherent distributive coalition” eschewing the need to build regional
and local party organisations.
and
The jacket of the book carries two photographs: One, of the bare-headed
Mahatma addressing a disparate but attentive crowd of khadi-clad women
and men in the open, and the other of Mohammed Ali Jinnah, - imperious,
cigarette between his lips and under a parasol held by a liveried
servant, holding court. Together they offer a fine example of visual
semiotics.
