skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The man is simply brilliant!
Ida: Sorry! So, we’ve talked about Noon, we’ve talked about Pakistan and your father, what about India? You’ve said some pretty harsh things about a certain writer cum activists on the Left–no names!–who, we in the States, kind of like. She seems, in an environment of rapacious capitalism, to be a friend of the poor and marginalised. What possible objection could you have to her?
Aatish: None except that I don’t think she’s a friend of the poor at all. She would like to doom them to a permanent state of picturesque poverty. They are beautiful to her–the poor–beautiful, benign and faceless. And that is exactly how she wants them to stay. Let me say also that it is not the poor who animate her politics. Oh, no! The people who get her into the streets are the new middle classes. This class, still among the most fragile in India, people who have newly emerged from the most dire conditions, are despicable to her. She mocks their clothes; their trouble with English; she hates their ambitions; when India wins the cricket and she sees them celebrating, her skin crawls; she wants, more than anything, to do these people down. And it is her overwhelming hatred of them that allows her to be a friend of movements that are seemingly far apart. The jihadists, the Maoists, the Kashmir movement, the anti-development people…they’re all her friends. Anyone who can prove a credible threat to the future of India is a friend of that woman. I would go so far as to say she has a prurient fascination with the enemies of India. And where do they love her? In Pakistan, and in the faculty rooms of Europe and America. No surprise there.
Also, this business of pretending she’s a lone voice in the wilderness. What rubbish! At least have the good grace to admit that not one thing she says is provocative or new; it is perfectly banal. And we know how well the universities Europe and America reward this bogus cant!

Vishal · 698 weeks ago
Madhu · 677 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 698 weeks ago
"Nine Lives". http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/oct/04/nine-...
suresh · 676 weeks ago
Arundhati Roy is someone who I will only support if the Indian state tries to curtail her voice. She never has anything substantive to bring to any debate or to any issue. She revels in her own literary concoctions she calls "essays" which is nothing but proselytizing her visceral hate of all things progressive to india and indulging in some grand standing with an eye to some far of academics and intelluctuals in europe and america who see her as some kind of voice for the oppressed and down trodden when in reality she cannot be more far removed from the wretched lives she tried to defend with a victorian eloquence of a convent.
Arun · 676 weeks ago