Sunday, April 10, 2011

Bhangra Blowout 18

Here is a photograph from Bhangra Blowout 18:

20110409-_MG_2920

Here is a picture from Bhangra Blowout 17
_MG_2204
(The full set is here.)

I've yet to process the 1K+ shots from Bhangra Blowout 18, but they're not very different from the first picture above.

What are the differences?  Last year's (BB 17) was taken with the 5D + 135mm f/2, ISO 3200, from a position at the foot of the stage, but (facing the stage) to the extreme left.   This year's (BB 18) was taken with the 5D2 + 70-200mm f/2.8 IS v2, ISO 6400,  with a center view of the stage, but about 20 rows away.  You can see all the stage paraphernalia in the BB 18 shot that tends to ruin the view.   The shot from BB 17 above has some photographer's head on the right, but it is only a minor distraction.

Also, last year, the dance teams used a lot of lighting.  This year, though the stage - a different venue from last year - had a lot of lighting capabilities (as, e.g., was evident in the exhibition dance), it was little used, and the dancers typically had stark black as the background.

Whenever I post the BB 18 set, it will be found on Flickr, here.

I mourn my stolen 135mm f/2. Having the additional stop would have been very useful.

The 5D2 provides a lot more croppable pixels and that is a blessing.

PS: Just FYI, the uncropped views from 70mm and 200mm were as follows:

20110409-_MG_2583

20110409-_MG_2643


PPS: Last year's competitition was at the Daughters of the American Revolution Constitution Hall; this year's at the Warner Theatre.

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
V nice!
Very cool! Who organizes this event? I saw some non-Indian faces also in the dance. Is it some school event?
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Bhangra Blowout is an intercollegiate bhangra competition organized by George Washington University.
In my view, the photographs - the ones where you nailed the focus - from this year are lovely. Most of your images from last year suffer from veiling flare. The stark black background contrasts nicely with the colourful outfits. The stage paraphernalia hardly distracts. My guess is that you may have benefited from the 135L, a stop faster and a pound or two lighter.
Well, last year, some of the stagelights pointed directly at the camera. However, the overall color was there and visible to the naked eye - unless the eye itself was subject to veiling flare :) How bad or good the 135L is with flare can be clearly judged from this picture: http://www.flickr.com/photos/macgupta/4536058777/ where but for the dancer's feet the white spotlight would be fully visible in the camera.

Somehow I feel last year's photos got the energy of the dance better.

Post a new comment

Comments by