skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Sunny Singh writes in the Guardian:
What a surprise that Nigel Farage has endorsed the new fantasy-disguised-as-historical war film, Dunkirk. Christopher Nolan’s movie
is an inadvertently timely, thinly veiled Brexiteer fantasy in which
plucky Britons heroically retreat from the dangerous shores of Europe.
Most importantly, it pushes the narrative that it was Britain as it
exists today – and not the one with a global empire – that stood alone
against the “European peril”.
To do so, it erases the Royal Indian Army Services Corp companies,
which were not only on the beach, but tasked with transporting supplies
over terrain that was inaccessible for the British Expeditionary
Force’s motorised transport companies. It also ignores the fact that by
1938, lascars – mostly from South Asia and East Africa – counted for one of four crewmen on British merchant vessels, and thus participated in large numbers in the evacuation.
.....
Perhaps Nolan chose to follow the example of the original allies in the second world war who staged a white-only liberation of Paris even though 65% of the Free French Army troops were from West Africa.
......
All storytellers – and novelists, poets, journalists, and filmmakers
are, ultimately, just that – know the power we hold. Stories can
dehumanise, demonise and erase. Such stories are essential to pave the
way for physical and material violence against those we learn to hate.
But stories are also the only means of humanising those deemed inhuman;
to create pity, compassion, sympathy, even love for those who are
strange and strangers. Stories decide the difference between life and
death. And that is why Dunkirk – and indeed any story – is never just a
story.