When, in India, a Hindu woman marries a Muslim man,
The Supreme Court judgement is available here (Google Drive Link, hope it works).
The only proponents for the Uniform Civil Code that the Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution call for, are the so-called Hindu nationalists. The so-called secularists don't want to fix these kinds of problems.
PS: Until this problem is fixed, anyone who finds inter-religious marriages of Hindu women with Muslim men to be acceptable has to be termed as a anti-Hindu misogynist.
the marriage of a Hindu female with a Muslim male is not a regular or valid (sahih) marriage, but merely an irregular (fasid) marriage.Thus has the Supreme Court of India ruled, January 22 of this year. The Court further notes that "the legal effect of a fasid marriage is that" the wife "is not entitled to inherit the properties of the husband".
The Supreme Court judgement is available here (Google Drive Link, hope it works).
The only proponents for the Uniform Civil Code that the Directive Principles of the Indian Constitution call for, are the so-called Hindu nationalists. The so-called secularists don't want to fix these kinds of problems.
PS: Until this problem is fixed, anyone who finds inter-religious marriages of Hindu women with Muslim men to be acceptable has to be termed as a anti-Hindu misogynist.
