Friday, July 03, 2026

Ai (Gemini) has a sense of humor

When asked about a Bollywood song, Google Gemini responded:

Ah, you are talking about the beautiful track "Sheesha-E-Dil Itna Na Uchhalo" from the 1960 film Dil Apna Aur Preet Parai!

Sung by Lata Mangeshkar, composed by Shankar-Jaikishan, and penned by Hasrat Jaipuri, this song was picturized on Meena Kumari as she sings on a boat.

While it is a beloved classic today, it actually ran into some trouble with the All India Radio (AIR) screening committees at the time of its release.

AIR objected to a specific line in the lyrics because it was deemed "absurd" or "unscientific" by their highly rigid, literal-minded screening board. The line that caused the stir was:

"Ye kehne aayi hain sau machhliyaan kinaaron par..." (A hundred fish have come to the shores to say this...)

The AIR censors took the lyric entirely too literally, arguing that fish cannot leave the water to come onto the shores to speak or "say" things, and therefore the imagery was ridiculous and misleading for public broadcast. Because of this bizarrely strict, hyper-literal interpretation of poetic license, the song faced a temporary broadcast hurdle on state radio.

It remains a classic example of the era's hyper-regulation, where even harmless, whimsical romantic imagery was over-analyzed by radio bureaucrats!


The real story is: https://www.rediff.com/movies/special/when-he-spoke-the-whole-nation-listened/20240313.htm. (2024)

In 1960, when the film Dil Apna Aur Preet Parai hit the theatres, one of its songs drew frowns from an information and broadcasting minister, notoriously wary of the corrupting influence of Hindi film music.

Sheesha‐E‐Dil Itna Na Uchhalo was the 'decadent' song that riled B V Keskar. {It features a bunch of young women - nurses? -- one or two in one-piece swimsuits - dancing on a beach and in the water.}.

On his orders, a clerk pasted a ban sticker on the album's 78 RPM vinyl record. But he pasted the 'NA' sticker on the wrong side and ended up banning the memorable Ajeeb Dastan Hai Yeh from the airwaves for a number of years. 

 Radio legend Ameen Sayani, who breathed his last on February 20, shared the anecdote with Pervaiz Alam, a former broadcaster with BBC Hindi.

Sayani, 91, regaled Alam with several stories that are now part of nostalgia -- just as he did millions of rapt listeners on radio with an iconic voice and mannerism that set the benchmark for broadcasters in India.

It is well-known how Keskar's moral policing became a boon for Radio Ceylon.

Keskar had his prudish notions on culture and decided to ban film songs on All India Radio (AIR) in 1952.

Sayani swiftly seized an opportunity at the Sri Lanka-based Radio Ceylon and presented the iconic Binaca Geetmala, a weekly show that introduced listeners to the catchiest new songs in a golden era of Bollywood.

The show ran from 1952 to 1988 on Radio Ceylon, before shifting to AIR's Vividh Bharti -- until 1994 with a rechristened name, Cibaca Geetmala.

Alam, who interviewed Sayani at length for an archive for public broadcaster Doordarshan, recalled growing up in Aligarh as an ardent listener of Binaca Geetmala.

"The traffic in the city would stop when his programme was aired. There were communal tensions and other problems, but on Wednesday evenings, he would say 'Behnon aur bhaiyon' and everyone would listen to his calm and soothing voice."

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Classic Institutional Self-Preservation Mechanism?

 

Hegseth, Secretary of War, on Iran: "We will keep pressing. We will keep pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies." [1]

 

US Department of Defense Law of War Manual: [2]

 

5.4.7 Prohibition Against Declaring That No Quarter Be GivenIt is forbidden to declare that no quarter will be given. This means that it is prohibited to order that legitimate offers of surrender will be refused or that detainees, such as unprivileged belligerents, will be summarily executed. Moreover, it is also prohibited to conduct hostilities on the basis that there shall be no survivors, or to threaten the adversary with the denial of quarter. 

This rule is based on both humanitarian and military considerations.This rule also applies during non-international armed conflict.

 

Congressional testimony [3] : CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper was simply unable to affirm in particular that it is forbidden to declare that no quarter will be given.  He just give generic "we will follow the law" statements.

 

Example:

 

Representative Jason Crow of Colorado: You're a combatant commander. You're one of our most senior military officers with tens of thousands of service members under your command. Does the law of war manual state that it is prohibited to utter to declare that no quarter be given?

 

Admiral Brad Cooper: It prohibits a large number of things. It will follow

 

Crow: I just read the provision to you. I just literally read the provision to you. Does it prohibit you or anyone else from declaring that no quarter be given? I just read it to you.

 

Cooper:  We will follow everything that's in the law.

 

Crow: Answer the question, Admiral Cooper. You have tens of thousands of service members under your command. I literally just read a provision from the Law of War manual, our own manual. Will you not just say what I just read to you?

 

Cooper: I will say that we will follow the law of armed conflict to the tea.

 

Crow: This is, this is, this is just unbelievable to me. I find the same thing, sir. This is just unbelievable to me.

 

 

 

[1] Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Air Force Gen. Dan Caine Hold a Press Briefing, March 13, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4434484/secretary-of-war-pete-hegseth-and-chairman-of-the-joint-chiefs-air-force-gen-da/

 

[2] US Department of Defense Law of War Manual, June 2015, updated July 2023.

https://media.defense.gov/2023/Jul/31/2003271432/-1/-1/0/dod-law-of-war-manual-june-2015-updated-july%202023.pdf

 

[3] Transcript of YouTube, CBS News, May 19, 2026 :  Tense exchange between Rep. Crow and CENTCOM commander over Iran, rules on quarter for enemies, https://youtu.be/2kIAUFKSc38

 

---

AI found several examples of such from the 19th century, and from the Vietnam war, and explains:

 

"What you are observing in the exchange between Rep. Crow and Admiral Cooper is a classic institutional self-preservation mechanism.

 

When a civilian leader (like a Secretary of Defense) uses illegal wartime rhetoric ("no quarter"), it places the uniform military leadership in a dangerous trap. If the Admiral explicitly agrees with the lawmaker that the Secretary's words describe an illegal war crime, he is publicly rebuking his civilian boss—a violation of the American norm of civilian control of the military. If he agrees with the Secretary, he is endorsing a war crime."

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Cormorant


 

Monday, September 22, 2025

Did the US suffer from a STEM labor shortage 2011-2021?

 

The estimate below shows that American production of STEM graduates during 2011-2021 did not keep up with the demand for such in the workforce.  The shortfall must have been made up from imported labor.

 

Table SLBR-2 in this  NSF web publication

https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20245/u-s-stem-workforce-size-growth-and-employment

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The data says that the number of employed workers in STEM occupations with a bachelor’s degree or higher grew from 11,858,595 in 2011 to 17,547,951 in 2021.

This is an increase of 5,689,356.

From the National Center for Education Statistics, the number of post-secondary degrees and certificates in STEM conferred 2012-13 to 2022-23 is given (11 years)

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d24/tables/dt24_318.45.asp

 

 

If we take the first ten years, subtracting off non-residents, it is just under 6 million graduates.

Of course, there is overcounting here, because someone who got a bachelor’s in 2012 might have obtained a masters in 2014, and is counted twice.  But let’s not worry about that.  Also, not everyone with a STEM degree ends up in a STEM career.

Then there is attrition - from the approximately 12 million workers in 2011, how many retired?  

If the number of employed workers was constant, and a career lasts 50 years, then 2% of the workers should retire each year.  If the number of workers is growing with more young entrants, then that number should be less. Google AI says that in 2006, there were 9.4 million employed workers in STEM occupations with bachelor’s or more (it said it couldn’t find specific numbers for 2001).  We can’t linearly extrapolate because it would mean about zero such workers in the late 1980s.   Let’s go with 0.5% per year of the 12 million in 2011 retired or otherwise left the field, and that amounts to 600,000.

So the US produced a maximum of 6 million graduates and required 5.7 million for the new jobs and 0.6 million for the existing jobs vacated by retirees.  That is already a shortage of 300K.

About the double counting - 

Google AI says: Over the decade between 2011 and 2021, Science & Engineering master's degrees consistently increased, averaging more than 170,000 awards per year; and in 2021, 217,000 Science & Engineering masters were awarded of which 60,000 were to international students.  

If we take 70% of the masters to be awarded to American citizens or permanent residents, then in 2011-2021, about 1.2 million masters were awarded, and these are double-counted with those who got bachelors. That would increase the shortage to 1.5 million.

The conclusion is that yes, the US suffered from a STEM labor shortage between 2011 and 2021.   

 

 

 

 

Monday, September 01, 2025

RIC meeting

 The RIC meeting, drawn by Google Gemini:


Dragon, Tiger and Bear meet while Donkey is angry


Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Flowerpecker


 

Sunday, November 10, 2024

Barbets