FYI: 1 lakh = 100,000, 1 crore = 10,000,000
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
Corruption in India
Forwarded to me. If India was not so corrupt, why should anyone in India be poor?
FYI: 1 lakh = 100,000, 1 crore = 10,000,000
FYI: 1 lakh = 100,000, 1 crore = 10,000,000
Comments (4)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Corruption in India
2011-02-09T08:02:00-05:00
Arun
India|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Shankar · 733 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 733 weeks ago
India budgets and spends a lot on development - which, if it reached the intended recipients, would have greatly alleviated poverty. Instead it illegally gets siphoned into the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats on the way, and very little of it actually is spent on the development schemes. With the amount of money budgeted, no child in India need be hungry or without school - except that the corrupt ate it all up.
macgupta 81p · 733 weeks ago
Suppose India starts at a GDP of 100 and grows at 8% a year. Over a five year span, its GDP (rounded) is
100, 108, 117, 126, 136. Over 5 years, India has generated a total of 587.
If instead, India grew at a rate of 10% a year, that series is 100, 110, 121, 133, 146, for a 5 year total of 610.
The accumulated wealth is about 4% more than the previous scenario. The effect on people's lives, assuming that the good fortune is well distributed, is enormous.
Siddhartha · 727 weeks ago
- Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, 16/4, Girish Banerjee Lane, Howrah-711101, India.