Professor Katz illustrates this with a nifty calculation. Between 1979
and 2012, the share of national income captured by the richest 1 percent
of taxpayers increased from 10 percent to 22.5 percent. Had their share
instead remained at 10 percent and the rest been distributed equitably
among taxpayers in the bottom 99 percent, each would have $7,105 more to
spend.
By contrast, between 1979 and 2012 the gap between the annual wages of a
typical family of two full-time workers with college degrees and one
made up of two high school graduates grew by $30,000, after inflation.
“Nothing we do with the education supply will have a big impact among
the top 1 percent,” Professor Katz said. But “could it improve the
upward mobility and the prospects of a better job for Americans born in
the bottom half of the income distribution? Yes.”
No comments:
Post a Comment