Monday, August 13, 2007

Evading Reality - 1

Via a comment at turcopolier.typepad.com
George Orwell: ‘In Front of Your Nose’
First published: Tribune. — GB, London. — March 22, 1946.
Reprinted:
— ‘The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell’. — 1968.
Excerpt:
There is no use in multiplying examples. The point is that we are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.

When one looks at the all-prevailing schizophrenia of democratic societies, the lies that have to be told for vote-catching purposes, the silence about major issues, the distortions of the press, it is tempting to believe that in totalitarian countries there is less humbug, more facing of the facts. There, at least, the ruling groups are not dependent on popular favour and can utter the truth crudely and brutally. Goering could say ‘Guns before butter’, while his democratic opposite numbers had to wrap the same sentiment up in hundreds of hypocritical words.

Actually, however, the avoidance of reality is much the same everywhere, and has much the same consequences. The Russian people were taught for years that they were better off than everybody else, and propaganda posters showed Russian families sitting down to abundant meal while the proletariat of other countries starved in the gutter. Meanwhile the workers in the western countries were so much better off than those of the U.S.S.R. that non-contact between Soviet citizens and outsiders had to be a guiding principle of policy. Then, as a result of the war, millions of ordinary Russians penetrated far into Europe, and when they return home the original avoidance of reality will inevitably be paid for in frictions of various kinds. The Germans and the Japanese lost the war quite largely because their rulers were unable to see facts which were plain to any dispassionate eye.

To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle. One thing that helps toward it is to keep a diary, or, at any rate, to keep some kind of record of one's opinions about important events. Otherwise, when some particularly absurd belief is exploded by events, one may simply forget that one ever held it. Political predictions are usually wrong. But even when one makes a correct one, to discover why one was right can be very illuminating. In general, one is only right when either wish or fear coincides with reality. If one recognizes this, one cannot, of course, get rid of one's subjective feelings, but one can to some extent insulate them from one's thinking and make predictions cold-bloodedly, by the book of arithmetic. In private life most people are fairly realistic. When one is making out one's weekly budget, two and two invariably make four. Politics, on the other hand, is a sort of sub-atomic or non-Euclidean word where it is quite easy for the part to be greater than the whole or for two objects to be in the same place simultaneously. Hence the contradictions and absurdities I have chronicled above, all finally traceable to a secret belief that one's political opinions, unlike the weekly budget, will not have to be tested against solid reality.

4 comments:

  1. That's an interesting quotation. The problem though is that the human lifetime is finite, so it is possible to indeed believe things that are untrue without being 'finally proved wrong'. Just make yourself believe you're the unrecognized genius who intimately knows nature's ways - just that nobody is able to understand you. Just make yourself believe your country has the best infrastructure whatsoever, and your children are the prettiest in the whole neighborhood. Just fake your own reality and die happily ever after. Do we really have to finally 'realize' what part of our believes is true?

    ReplyDelete
  2. True, there are whole bunches of beliefs that do not " bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield".

    ReplyDelete
  3. You believe that is true?

    ;-)

    I'm afraid I don't believe in the whole concept of a 'solid reality'. To me it seems the whole western world is 'swimming in the make believe'.

    ReplyDelete
  4. PS: That's an album by Jeff Larson. Very nice, calm, pleasant voice, overall recommendable

    http://www.amazon.com/Swimming-Make-Believe-Jeff-Larson/dp/B000FFL0MM

    ReplyDelete