Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Intelligence & genetics

A news-item on GenomeWeb:

Rather than having genetic variants that make them smart, brainy people may lack mutations that make them less clever, New Scientist reports.

In a paper posted to BioRxiv, researchers from the University of Edinburgh report that they genotyped some 20,000 people from the Generation Scotland family cohort to tease out the effects of gene variants on intelligence, extraversion, and neuroticism. As the cohort includes family members, the researchers could delve into variants not typically found in genome-wide association studies of unrelated people.

.....
In particular, New Scientist says that CNVs, structural variants, and rare variants seem to affect intelligence. As rare variants are more likely to be harmful, New Scientist says it appears that a person's intelligence might be in part due to their mutational load.
Note 1: CNV = copy number variations
Note 2: It would seem high intelligence is the norm, and variation away from the norm reduces intelligence.  Rather amusing, and this would be a blow to the IQ-metricians, I think.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I don't think it's news to the mainstream, but it's another hole in the IQ 1000 boat. It's long been known or suspected that most very low IQs are associated with defective functioning of neural components. But there is also evidence that some variants are associated with higher IQs, which is exactly as surprising that some genetic variants are associated with greater adult height.
same guest's avatar

same guest · 402 weeks ago

I found it equally interesting that education, frequently used as an IQ proxy, did not show the same genetic profile as IQ.
But how would you get a Bell curve?
In this case one would expect an asymmetric distribution with a peak at e.g. 135 and a long tail towards lower IQs imho ...
1 reply · active 402 weeks ago
Well, it is genes + development (actual cell divisions and growth & organization of tissues) + environment.

Post a new comment

Comments by