Wednesday, February 08, 2017

Confirmation Bias?

There are a number of stories about how UnPresident Trump operates:

Caroline Mortimer reports in the Independent,  that Defence Secretary General James Mattis and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Dunford, convinced Trump to go along with an anti-terrorist raid in Yemen that turned out poorly, by suggesting that Obama would never have been so bold as to actually go through with it (the conception of the operation lies in the Obama era).

S.V. Date and Christina Wilkie report in the Huffington Post that Trump called his National Security Adviser retd. Lt. General Mike Flynn at 3 A.M. in the morning to ask him whether it was a strong dollar or a weak dollar that would be good for the US economy.

Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman report in the New York Times that Trump was angered that he "was not fully briefed on the details of the executive order he signed giving his chief strategist {Steve Bannon} a seat on the National Security Council".


There are more examples, but these should suffice.  All of these stories are from unnamed sources (which is why I've taken care to mention the reporters' names), they fit in with how we imagine Trump to be (e.g., based on the content and timing of his tweets) but are they true?




Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
The question in my mind is whether we can trust anybody's word on anything. I've always felt the USA media lied a lot (and by extension all other media has to be suspect). I think most Americans are familiar with the Iraq WMD fiasco, but there are many other examples. One I like to mention is the Clinton/Blair claim that genocide was taking place in Kosovo in late 1998 and early 1999.
2 replies · active 421 weeks ago
How skeptical the media was of Clinton/Blair claims of genocide in Kosovo? Good question.
After the fact, in 2001 "A United Nations court has ruled that Serbian troops did not carry out genocide against ethnic Albanians during Slobodan Milosevic's campaign of aggression in Kosovo from 1998 to 1999. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1530781.stm
The media played ball with Clinton and Blair. I had been living in Russia in previous years, and i had contacts and access to Russian publications. This allowed me to check both sides of the story. When Albright went to Rambouillet and issued her ultimatum it was clear she had convinced Clinton to peddle lies and do whatever it took to start s war. The idea was to show that Clinton would bomb for Muslims somewhere. This in turn was triggered by the coming failure of the Israel-Palestine talks, in which Clinton was taking a pro Israel stance.

So the USA bombed away, the Serbs resisted much more than the stooges in charge anticipated. And the media kept backing Clinton as he went on to order war crimes. It's an interesting story, which I use to point out it sure looks like everybody lies.

Post a new comment

Comments by