Caroline Mortimer reports in the Independent, that Defence Secretary General James Mattis and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Dunford, convinced Trump to go along with an anti-terrorist raid in Yemen that turned out poorly, by suggesting that Obama would never have been so bold as to actually go through with it (the conception of the operation lies in the Obama era).
S.V. Date and Christina Wilkie report in the Huffington Post that Trump called his National Security Adviser retd. Lt. General Mike Flynn at 3 A.M. in the morning to ask him whether it was a strong dollar or a weak dollar that would be good for the US economy.
Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman report in the New York Times that Trump was angered that he "was not fully briefed on the details of the executive order he signed giving his chief strategist {Steve Bannon} a seat on the National Security Council".
There are more examples, but these should suffice. All of these stories are from unnamed sources (which is why I've taken care to mention the reporters' names), they fit in with how we imagine Trump to be (e.g., based on the content and timing of his tweets) but are they true?
fernandoleanme 16p · 421 weeks ago
macgupta 81p · 421 weeks ago
After the fact, in 2001 "A United Nations court has ruled that Serbian troops did not carry out genocide against ethnic Albanians during Slobodan Milosevic's campaign of aggression in Kosovo from 1998 to 1999. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1530781.stm
fernandoleanme 16p · 421 weeks ago
So the USA bombed away, the Serbs resisted much more than the stooges in charge anticipated. And the media kept backing Clinton as he went on to order war crimes. It's an interesting story, which I use to point out it sure looks like everybody lies.