Monday, March 21, 2016

How India Made Britain More Literate


Dharampal’s book ‘The Beautiful Tree’ contains a 1823 report by Ballari district collector. The collector mentions a curious fact:

The economy with which children are taught to write in the native schools, and the system by which the more advanced scholars are caused to teach the less advanced and at the same time to confirm their own knowledge is certainly admirable, and well deserved the imitation it has received in England.

Rev. Bell was in India to work in the asylum for the progeny of British soldiers through native Indian women, whom of course the soldiers abandoned. The imported teachers for these children were not exactly enthusiastic. One day as he was riding along Madras beach he noticed a native school session. He saw “little children writing with their fingers on sand, which after the fashion of such schools, had been strewn before them for that purpose” and he also saw “peer teaching - children learning from one another.”

Bell had his Eureka moment. He experimented successfully with this method and in 1797 published the description of his “Madras method” in England. Tooley discovered that the new National Society for the Education for the Poor in 1811 adapted this Madras method and by 1821, 300,000 children were being educated by Bell’s principles .

Meanwhile Jospeh Lancaster has launched his famous Lancastrian schools for furthering education in England. Bell and Lancaster entered into a bitter controversy as to the intellectual property of the particular system of education. But Tooley points out that “it wasn’t invented by either Bell or Lancaster. It was based precisely on what the Rev.Dr.Andrew Bell had observed in India”.

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Fascinating!

It would be interesting to trace how that affected schooling in the West generally. Is it reasonable to guess that schools in the US took the lead from England?

Of course that's hardly the only case where invading barbarians learned from the civilization they conquered - in fact, an Archaeologist friend assures me that that is the rule more than the exception. Aside from the various other invaders of India, there are also the Romans learning from the Greeks, the Mongols from the Chinese and a few zillion cases in the Middle East.
1 reply · active 468 weeks ago
Learning from other cultures is actually common and hardly remarkable. What is most interesting is how often the origin of ideas is obscured. Even more fascinating is the round-tripping of ideas. E.g., in "Fruitless Fall: The Collapse of the Honey Bee and the Coming Agricultural Crisis" by Rowan Jacobsen, the author notes the work of a Vermont beekeeper, Kirk Webster: "Central to Webster's worldview was the work of Sir Albert Howard, the father of the organic farming movement. Howard, Britain's imperial economic botanist in India in the early 1900s, studied the farming practices of India's peasants and wrote two books based on his observations: "An Agricultural Testament" and "The Soil and Health". He was knighted for his work in 1935."

In the name of god-knows-what, "science" or something, many of these practices were wiped out; and now the organic farming movement comes back to India with a western garb; much of the Indian tradition having been lost.

Post a new comment

Comments by