Concordia University
{Montreal, Canada} researcher Damon Matthews thinks that
India holds the world's biggest carbon credit!
Montreal, September 8, 2015 — All countries have contributed
to recent climate change, but some much more so than others. Those that
have contributed more than their fair share have accumulated a climate
debt, owed to countries that have contributed less to historical
warming.
This is the implication of a new study published in Nature Climate Change,
in which Concordia University researcher Damon Matthews shows how
national carbon and climate debts could be used to decide who should pay
for the global costs of climate mitigation and damages.
The countries that have accumulated the largest carbon debts on account of higher than average per-capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are the United States, Russia, Japan, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia.
The U.S. alone carries 40 per cent of the cumulative world debt,
while Canada carries about four per cent. On the other side, the carbon
creditors — those whose share of CO2 emissions has been
smaller than their share of world population — are India, Indonesia,
Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil and China, with India holding 30
per cent of the total world credit.
Calculating climate responsibility
To estimate differences in national responsibility for historical
climate changes, Matthews first calculated carbon debts and credits
based on fossil fuel CO2 emission and population records
since 1990. It was around this date that scientific knowledge and public
understanding of the dangers of human-driven climate changes began to
solidify.
Since that time, the total carbon debt across all debtor nations has
increased to 250 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide. And it’s still going
up: the increase in world carbon debt in 2013 alone was 13 billion
tonnes, or about 35% of global CO2 emissions in that year.
So what is the monetary value of this debt? “According to a recent
U.S. government report, the current best estimate of the social cost of
present-day CO2 emissions is about $40 USD per tonne of CO2,”
says Matthews. “Multiply $40 by the 13 billion tonnes of carbon debt
accrued in 2013, and you get $520 billion. This cost estimate gives us
an indication of how much we could be paying to help lower-emitting
countries cope with the costs of climate changes, or develop their
economies along carbon-free pathways.”
Looking at the total world carbon debt, the numbers are even more
staggering: the 250 billion tonnes of debt accumulated since 1990, at
$40 per tonne, represents $10 trillion USD. “No matter how you look at
this picture, these numbers are really big — much, much larger than even
the most generous financial commitments currently pledged by countries
to help with the cost of climate adaptation and damages in vulnerable
countries.”
CO2 emissions vs. degrees of debt
Matthews also calculated how much each country has over- or
under-contributed to temperature increases as a result of a range of
different greenhouse gas emissions. By this measure, the total
accumulated world climate debt comes to 0.1 °C since 1990, close to a
third of observed warming over this period of time. Again the U.S. is
the single largest debtor, and India is the largest creditor. Some
countries, however, like Brazil and Indonesia, switch from being carbon
creditors, to being among the climate debtor countries, as a result of
the additional greenhouse gas emissions produced by deforestation and
agriculture.
“This idea of climate and carbon debts and credits highlight the
large historical inequalities with respect to how much individual
countries have contributed to climate warming,” says Matthews. “The
historical debts and credits calculated here could be a helpful tool to
inform policy discussions relating to historical responsibility and
burden sharing, by providing a measure of who should pay — and how much
they might be expected to pay — for the costs of mitigation and climate
damages in countries with lower emissions.”