Matthew Yglesias summarizes the New York Times on the North Korean nuclear program thusly:
"
The 1994 Agreed Framework froze the DPRK efforts to build a nuclear weapon using plutonium.
In 2002, the Bush administration pulled out of the Agreed Framework, arguing that the DPRK was cheating by running a secret parallel uranium program.
In the intervening years, the DPRK has succeeded in using its now-unfrozen plutonium program to build some bombs.
They have not, however, had any success in building uranium bombs.
This looked like pretty shitty policymaking for the Bush administration.
It looks much worse, however, after we learn today that the uranium program may never have existed.
"
My question is - was the 2002 intelligence also cooked, like that on Iraqi WMD?