The English history of India is akin to one written from the point of view of the locusts, not of the farmer. The scale of destruction the English wrought in India would rank them with Stalin and Hitler and Pol Pot as the great destroyers of the world. But history is written by the victors, and so they claim they brought Civilization.
Hitler, in a way, and unintentionally, of course, was a great liberator. His war once and for all put an end to the colonial powers, and after World War II, European empires were dismantled and Asia and Africa were decolonized. But the damage these empires wrought was enormous, and the world is yet to recover.
North Beach candids
42 minutes ago
4 comments:
Could you point out sources?
I agree colonialism set back India for a couple of centuries (growth nearly zero).
However, there was a a lot of "blaming colonialism" for all the ills, which stopped people in India from working to improve their situation. As a result, there was a lot of brain drain.
But things have changed for the better in the past decade. What has helped was that India became one country, unlike say Africa, so it is no longer possinle to "divide and rule". It is not surprising India and China have weathered financial crises, since they are big enough to not follow IMF diktats.
Hi Gindy,
I applaud your respectful tone.
I am of Indian descent, and having read history of both East and West from diverse sources, I think the comparison of English brutality to Hitler and Stalin is over the top. I can think of millions dying during the Great Bengal Famine of 1942 that killed millions (similar to the Irish potato famine). But to compare that to Hitler's genocide is too much, IMHO. The British were brutal at times (like massacare via machine gun of thousands of innocent unarmed civilians peacefully protesting in a walled park), but they did not kill people in the millions every year in India.
I do agree that colonialism retarded progress greatly in India. The so-called "advantages" of colonialism to India, like English language, could have been gained more easily by trade without colonial conquest. But one (unintended) benefit of English conquest, is to unify India; it was earlier a collection of many small states.
MDR
By some peculiar coincidence, just after reading this post I read this article, and I read the lines
Mr. Sell might as well be in Stalin's Gulag or in the hands of the Waffen SS or US captors at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
MDR,
The Great Famine of 1942 was simply the last one of a pattern.
The effects of taxing people to the limit, on their income, and on essential commodities - such as salt, is as sure a way to kill them as to round them up in concentration camps.
-Arun
Post a Comment